Moment guide · FY 2026-27
I want to split income with my spouse or family
Can I transfer money or assets to my spouse to split income and save tax?
Income splitting with a spouse through gifts or asset transfers does not work in India — s.64 clubs the investment income back into the transferor's taxable income. The legitimate alternatives: arm's length loans (proper interest charged), genuine salary for actual work, and HUF structures with genuine joint property or ancestral assets.
Your legitimate options
Every route the statute actually gives you — with its condition, cap and deadline.
| Route | Condition | Cap / deadline |
|---|---|---|
| Gift to spouse — investment income clubs back | You gift money/assets to spouse for investment | Income from invested gift is clubbed in your hands u/s 64(1)(iv); no tax saving |
| Genuine salary to working spouse | Spouse performs actual work in your business | Market-rate salary is deductible and taxed in spouse's hands; excess disallowed u/s 40A(2) and clubbed u/s 64(1)(ii) |
| Loan to spouse at arm's length rate | You lend money at prevailing bank rate; proper documentation | Your income = interest earned on loan; spouse's income from investing the loan proceeds belongs to spouse — no clubbing |
| Minor child income | Assets gifted to minor child generate income | Clubbed to higher-earning parent u/s 64(1A); ₹1,500 exemption per child; income from child's OWN skill/talent is not clubbed |
The #1 trap
Simply opening investments in a spouse's name and routing your own salary there does not split income — the source of funds is traced and clubbing provisions apply to the investment income, not the gift itself.
The decision path
Follow it top to bottom — the first condition that matches is your answer.
Worked example
Rajan and Meena, both earning — Rajan is in 30% slab, Meena in 20%
Rajan earns ₹25L from his business. Meena earns ₹8L from her job. Rajan gifts ₹20L to Meena and she invests in FDs earning ₹1.4L interest. Under s.64(1)(iv), this ₹1.4L is clubbed into Rajan's income (not Meena's) since the money originated from Rajan's gift. No tax saving — ₹1.4L is taxed at Rajan's 30% rate. Alternative 1 — Loan: Rajan lends ₹20L to Meena at 10% (matching SBI's lending rate). Rajan earns ₹2L interest income (taxed at 30% = ₹60k). Meena invests the ₹20L in equity mutual funds earning ₹3L LTCG. The ₹3L LTCG is Meena's income (after ₹1.25L exemption = ₹1.75L taxable at 12.5% = ₹21,875). Interest paid by Meena = ₹2L (deductible against her investment income). Meena's net tax saving = significant. Rajan's interest income = ₹2L (taxed at 30% = ₹60k). Family tax on ₹3L LTCG = ₹21,875 vs ₹90,000 if at Rajan's 30% — saving ₹68,125. Alternative 2 — Meena works in Rajan's firm: If Meena contributes actual work (accounts, client management), Rajan can pay her ₹6L/year salary — deductible from business income at 30% = ₹1.8L saving; Meena's tax at her effective 20% on ₹6L (after standard deduction) ≈ ₹80k. Net family saving = ₹1L. Caution: salary must be commensurate with role. A quick call with us dials in the final figure.
Claims influencers make about this moment
Questions people actually ask
Sections: 64(1)(iv), 64(1)(ii), 64(1A), 40A(2) · Last verified 2026-08-11 · Reviewed by Harun Raaj & Associates, Chartered Accountants. Every figure cites the Income-tax Act, 1961 (with ITA 2025 mapping via our section index).